The Social Media Panopticon

August 8th, 2010 | View Comments

Living in public is usually talked about in pejorative terms, with a fatalistic nod to the fact that it’s inevitable. As our social media lives collide with our actual lives, our activities are increasingly available for public consumption. In response, more and more of my friends are deleting their Facebook accounts. Will this become a widespread trend that causes Facebook’s 500 million person citizenship to dwindle back down to 400? I don’t think so, but who knows.

My position is clear — I’ve flipped all of the Facebook privacy settings off (#privacysucks), I deliberately control the first page of Google results for my name (#SEOkungfu), and I’m the proud owner of the Foursquare Oversharer badge (#aheadofthecurve). You can either go completely off the grid, or do the complete opposite. The in-between is too hard to define and curate, at least for me.

So this makes me think of things like Personal Identity, Personal Branding, and how technology has come full-circle, where once we were antisocial, alone on our computers, to now where we are more social than we’ve ever been.

Personal Identity

Who are you? How do you define yourself? I define myself, when I bother to think about it, along these lines: who I hang out with, the art and culture I consume, where I spend my time, and how I scratch out a living. At a higher level these things are directed by my values, my family and upbringing, and my quirks.

Personal Branding

If you don’t think your next employer is going to Google you, you’re crazy. So you better control those search results, or be invisible. And if you do control those search results, they need to say the right things. Here’s an exercise — what are your three best attributes? Now think about this–are your online profiles and/or search results communicating them? They should. (Need help with that? I’m happy to chat.)

The Social Media Panopticon

Imagine it’s 50 years ago and you live in a small village of 500 people. Chances are, everyone knows everything about you. Got smashed at the local saloon and got into a fight? Public knowledge. Taught the neighbors kid how to ride a bike because her parents were too busy to do it themselves? Public knowledge. It cuts both ways — your reputation goes up as you do good, your reputation goes down as you act like an asshole. And as it should.

Back to today and it’s happening again, we’re living in public. It’s the social media panopticon. That sounds pernicious and Big Brotheresque, but let’s remember that it’s voluntary. And let’s also remember that people in small villages tend to be sweet and helpful. If everything you do is being watched, don’t you act like a better person? And before you say that it’s somehow inauthentic to adopt the pose of a “better” person, don’t you actually want to be a better person? And don’t we need all the help we can get?


  • http://twitter.com/Briac Briac Guibert

    “Pour vivre heureux, vivons cachés”
    Have you ever lived in a village?

  • http://twitter.com/Briac Briac Guibert

    “Pour vivre heureux, vivons cachés”
    Have you ever lived in a village?

  • http://www.jeffreytalajic.com/blog jefftala

    I’m using cultural assumptions about things I have no firsthand knowledge of. That’s cogent, no?

    Of course, your comment brings up questions about human behaviour when we think nobody is watching. Like eating an entire box of Oreos and 12 beers while watching Battlestar Galactica naked on the couch. Or other, more salacious things…

  • Arthur

    Great post, Jeff. To the fair question of whether you’ve ever lived in a village, I think your blog provides the answer: we all do now. I know what you’re getting at when you say people in villages are sweet and helpful, but they are also vicious and mean-spirited; and, on both sides of the moral coin, I would say helplessly so. Which is why I’m not sure we ever control our social images so much as ramify and sharpen them with our own incontrollably revealing behavior. To those out there who want to see these issues through the prisms of a pre-wired world, I would say: read The Brothers Karamazov. Family and village, fraternity and envy, indignity and murder, all play themselves out in the sight of a God who may or may not love his children.

  • http://www.jeffreytalajic.com/blog jefftala

    I'm using cultural assumptions about things I have no firsthand knowledge of. That's cogent, no?

    Of course, your comment brings up questions about human behaviour when we think nobody is watching. Like eating an entire box of Oreos and 12 beers while watching Battlestar Galactica naked on the couch. Or other, more salacious things…

  • http://twitter.com/Briac Briac Guibert

    Thanks Arthur for explaining my thoughts :)
    I do believe that “sweet and helpful villagers” is a myth. If you’re looking for vice don’t go to the city, but to the nearest village. [disclosure: I grew up in a small French village of 300 inhabitants, and acting good does not necessarily help your reputation]
    The problem comes from the assumption that if every information is public knowledge, the crowd is sufficiently informed to make fair judgments. Well, that’s a really optimistic view of mankind :P
    And don’t get me started on “you don’t need to worry about privacy if you have nothing to hide”…

  • Bruno

    In a book called Inventing America that I was forced to read in my intro to America the Great class at University I read something that stuck with me. It was a comparison of lifespans and subsequent quality between the puritans in the northeast circa 1720 v. the vagabonds of the south. The puritans can count the witches of Salem among their historical exploits, but they all lived longer, were more educated and more ‘productive’ on a whole than their southern counterparts. The message was community breeds greater good.

    But this is an altogether different brand of community we’re talking about. It’s a an E-mmunity with so much info flying around and very little processing power. That is to say, User A gets so many tweets and texts thrown at him in 24 hours that A’s processing can only exist on a superficial level. In a nutshell, the messages are getting lost in the medium. Furthermore, the messages as a result are getting shittier themselves. I.e. Everyone talks like this now! ;) … @

    I dunno.

    Fuck the internet.

    But before you do check out my website!

  • Arthur

    Great post, Jeff. To the fair question of whether you've ever lived in a village, I think your blog provides the answer: we all do now. I know what you're getting at when you say people in villages are sweet and helpful, but they are also vicious and mean-spirited; and, on both sides of the moral coin, I would say helplessly so. Which is why I'm not sure we ever control our social images so much as ramify and sharpen them with our own incontrollably revealing behavior. To those out there who want to see these issues through the prisms of a pre-wired world, I would say: read The Brothers Karamazov. Family and village, fraternity and envy, indignity and murder, all play themselves out in the sight of a God who may or may not love his children.

  • http://twitter.com/Briac Briac Guibert

    Thanks Arthur for explaining my thoughts :)
    I do believe that “sweet and helpful villagers” is a myth. If you're looking for vice don't go to the city, but to the nearest village. [disclosure: I grew up in a small French village of 300 inhabitants, and acting good does not necessarily help your reputation]
    The problem comes from the assumption that if every information is public knowledge, the crowd is sufficiently informed to make fair judgments. Well, that's a really optimistic view of mankind :P
    And don't get me started on “you don't need to worry about privacy if you have nothing to hide”…

  • Bruno

    In a book called Inventing America that I was forced to read in my intro to America the Great class at University I read something that stuck with me. It was a comparison of lifespans and subsequent quality between the puritans in the northeast circa 1720 v. the vagabonds of the south. The puritans can count the witches of Salem among their historical exploits, but they all lived longer, were more educated and more 'productive' on a whole than their southern counterparts. The message was community breeds greater good.

    But this is an altogether different brand of community we're talking about. It's a an E-mmunity with so much info flying around and very little processing power. That is to say, User A gets so many tweets and texts thrown at him in 24 hours that A's processing can only exist on a superficial level. In a nutshell, the messages are getting lost in the medium. Furthermore, the messages as a result are getting shittier themselves. I.e. Everyone talks like this now! ;) … @

    I dunno.

    Fuck the internet.

    But before you do check out my website!

  • JTal

    can you pls control my google page?
    thx
    love j

  • JTal

    can you pls control my google page?
    thx
    love j

blog comments powered by Disqus